DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE IN THE NEPALESE ECONOMY

  • Gyan Mani Adhikari Central Department of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Achyut Gnawali Central Department of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2827-7680
  • Binod Joshi Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Santosh Chhetri Tribhuvan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University
  • Krishna Bahadur Karki Tribhuvan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University
Keywords: Government Expenditure, Macroeconomy, VAR analysis, Impulse-Response, Variance Decomposition

Abstract

One of the central tenets of macroeconomics is that fiscal policy can effectively stabilize the economy and achieve macroeconomic targets. In the last few decades, monetary policy tools have been widely used to achieve this goal. There has been, however, a renewed interest in using fiscal policy as a stabilizing tool since the onset of the recent Global Financial Crisis. This study analyses the effects of changes in government expenditure on aggregate economic activity and how these effects are transmitted in the case of Nepal for the period 1990–2023. To analyze the transmission mechanism of government spending innovations, the Vector Autoregressive Model (VAR) is estimated for the following five variables: government expenditure, real GDP, private consumption, debt-to-GDP ratio, interest rate, and real exchange rate. The consumption and output respond negatively to the innovation in government expenditure, consistent with the standard neoclassical model. The interest rates increase in the face of expansionary fiscal spending. As government debt, builds up with fiscal expansion, the rising risk of default or increasing inflation risk reinforces crowding out through interest rates. The real exchange rate tends to appreciate in response to a rise in government spending. This finding is based on open economy literature and conventional literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gyan Mani Adhikari, Central Department of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

Dr. Gyan Mani Adhirakri is an Associate Professor at Central Department Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. 

Achyut Gnawali, Central Department of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

Professor. Achyut Gnawali PhD is a Professor at the Central Departmnet of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal 

Binod Joshi, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

Dr. Binod Joshi is an Associate Professor of Economics, at the Center for International Relations, Office of the Vice Chancellor, Tribhuwan University. 

Santosh Chhetri, Tribhuvan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University

  Dr.  Santosh Chhetri is an Assistant Professor of Economics, at Tribhuvan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University

Krishna Bahadur Karki, Tribhuvan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University

Dr. Krishna Bahadur Karki is an Assistant Professor of Economics, Tribhuvan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University

References

Aschauer, D., Greenwood, J., University of Western Ontario. Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario. Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations. (1984). Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy. Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario.
Bailey, M. J. (1971). National income and the price level: A study in macroeconomic theory. McGraw-Hill.
Barro, R. (1980). Output effects of government purchases. https://doi.org/10.3386/w0432
Bernanke, B. S., & Rotemberg, J. (1998). NBER macroeconomics annual 1997. MIT Press.
Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329-1368. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043
Cevik, M. S., & Miryugin, F. (2023). It’s never different: Fiscal policy shocks and inflation. International Monetary Fund.
Chen, Z. (2021). Essays on the US dollar dominated international financial market.
Chung, H., & Leeper, E. M. (2007). What has financed government debt?
Corsetti, G., Meier, M., & Müller, G. (2009). Fiscal stimulus with spending reversals. International Monetary Fund.
Devereux, M. B., Head, A. C., & Lapham, B. J. (1996). Monopolistic competition, increasing returns, and the effects of government spending. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.2307/2078025
Dufrénot, G. (2023). Fiscal policy issues. New Challenges for Macroeconomic Policies, 333-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15754-7_7
Enders, Z., Müller, G. J., & Scholl, A. (2008). How do fiscal and technology shocks affect real exchange rates?: New evidence for the United States.
Favero, C., & Giavazzi, F. (2012). Measuring tax multipliers: The narrative method in fiscal VARs. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.2.69
Foster, J. D. (2007). Keynesian Fiscal Stimulus Policies Stimulate Debt-Not the Economy. Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/report/keynesian-fiscal-stimulus-policies-stimulate-debt-not-the-economy
Galbács, P. (2015). The theory of new classical macroeconomics: A positive critique. Springer.
Galí, J., López-Salido, J. D., & Vallés, J. (2007). Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(1), 227-270. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.1.227
Hall, R. (1979). Labor supply and aggregate fluctuations. https://doi.org/10.3386/w0385
Infante, L., Lilla, F., & Vercelli, F. (2024). The effects of the pandemic on households' financial savings: A Bayesian structural VAR analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4849373
Kang, J., & Kim, S. (2021). Government spending news and surprise shocks: It's the timing and persistence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867115
Fostler, J. D. (2009). Keynesian fiscal stimulus policies stimulate debt- -not the economy. Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/report/keynesian-fiscal-stimulus-policies-stimulate-debt-not-the-economy
Kim, J. I. (2007). Fiscal policy and the exchange rate-current account nexus. International Monetary Fund.
Kim, S., & Roubini, N. (2008). Twin deficit or twin divergence? Fiscal policy, current account, and real exchange rate in the U.S. Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 362-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.05.012
Monachilli, T., & Perottiy, R. (2006). 8TH JACQUES POLAK ANNUAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE. International Monetary Fund.
Mountford, A., & Uhlig, H. (2008). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? [NBER WP 14551] https://doi.org/10.3386/w14551
Perotti, R. (2007). In search of the transmission mechanism of fiscal policy.
Rainone, E. (2023). Real-time identification and high-frequency analysis of deposit outflows. Journal of Financial Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbad012
Ramey, V. A., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Costly capital reallocation and the effects of government spending.
Ravn, M. O., Schmitt-Grohe, S., & Uribe, M. (2007). Explaining the effects of government spending shocks on consumption and the real exchange rate.
Rochon, L., Kappes, S., & Vallet, G. (2022). Central banking, monetary policy, and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review, 100(3), 763-801. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.763
Sargent, T. J. (1986). Government debt and taxes. [Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, WP 293] https://doi.org/10.21034/wp.293
Shields, K., & Lee, K. (2024). Measuring fiscal multipliers when it takes time to implement plans and to balance budgets. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4786786
Uhlig, H., & Mountford, A. (2002). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.306321
Published
2025-02-27